USPTO serial 78885816
POPXXI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POPXXI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | MICROWAVE POPCORN; POPCORN; UNPOPPED POPCORN | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |