USPTO serial 78885924
PERSONAL INJURY 101
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSONAL INJURY 101?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal services | PARTIALLY PAID | Jul 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2006 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |