USPTO serial 78885934
WE DELIVER! WWW.CN.CA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2011
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WE DELIVER! WWW.CN.CA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Montreal, Quebec, CA
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Montreal, Quebec, CA
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gianni P. Servodidio
Gianni P. Servodidio Jenner & Block LLP919 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | transportation of goods by rail, road and boat; rail and road transloading services, namely, freight loading from and to rail cars and from rail cars to tractor trailers and vice versa; freight forwarding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named WE DELIVER! WWW.CN.CA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 21, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 21, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | 44ED | 44(e) PETITION - DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |