Drawing for Serial No. 78885947

USPTO serial 78885947

Serial No. 78885947

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78885947?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. W. Reick

H W REICK PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTONPO BOX 2567695 KENMOOR SEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVEOct 3, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 26, 2009LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Jan 21, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 16, 2008CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 12, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 13, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 13, 2008CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Mar 13, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 2, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
May 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance