USPTO serial 78886090
SOPHIE'S PRODUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOPHIE'S PRODUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Canned fruits; Canned or bottled fruits; Canned or bottled vegetables; Cut fruits; Cut vegetables; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Dried vegetables; Dry or aromatized fruit; Food glazing preparations comprised primarily of fruit and/or fruit pectic for use in cooking and baking; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit and vegetable salads; Fruit chips; Fruit conserves; Fruit leathers; Fruit paste; Fruit pectin; Fruit peels; Fruit preserves; Fruit pulps; Fruit rinds; Fruit salads; Fruit topping; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Fruit-based food beverage; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Fruits preserved in alcohol; Glazed fruits; Pickled fruits; Pickled vegetables; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Preserved vegetables (in oil); Preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; Processed fruits; Processed garlic; Processed ginseng for use as a vegetable; Processed vegetables; Processed vegetables and fruits; Sliced fruits; Sliced vegetables; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Vegetable chips; Vegetable mousse; Vegetable oils; Vegetable oils and fats; Vegetable paste; Vegetable puree; Vegetable salads; Vegetable-based food beverages; Vegetable-based snack foods; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetables, instant frozen | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2007 |
| 030 | Fruit couli; Fruit flavourings, except essences; Fruit jellies; Vegetable concentrates used for seasoning | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2007 |
| 031 | Fresh fruits; Fresh vegetables; Raw fruits; Raw vegetables; Unprocessed fruits; Unprocessed vegetables | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2007 |
| 032 | Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit juices; Fruit nectars; Vegetable juices | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sophie's Produce
- Other trademarks owned by Sophie's Produce
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SOPHIE'S PRODUCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2007 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |