USPTO serial 78886335
NOVAHOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2011
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NOVAHOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Torrance, CA, US
Torrance, CA, US
Torrance, CA, US
TORRANCE, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Henricks
James A. Henricks HENRICKS SLAVIN LLPPO Box 341689AUSTIN, TX 78734UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning preparations, namely, clean room detergent, soap, solvent, and cleaner solutions for cleaning clean room equipment, cleanroom glass and cleanroom surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment, cleanroom floors, cleanroom walls, cleanroom ceilings, cleanroom curtains, laminar flow benches, glass and acrylic surfaces; low-ionic clean room detergent, soap, solvent, and cleaner solutions for cleaning walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; and clean room detergent, soap, solvent, and cleaner solutions filtered to less than 1 micron for cleaning walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; Disposable and reusable cleaning materials, namely, wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease equipment and surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains; wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds to degrease stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains; pre-saturated wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on clean room surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment, pre-saturated wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on cabinets, isolators and curtains | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 005 | [ Disposable and reusable cleaning materials, namely, wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds to sterilize, disinfect, and decontaminate equipment and surfaces, namely, walls, floors, ceilings, counters, furniture, coverings, glass and glassware and equipment; wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds to sterilize, disinfect, and decontaminate stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2007 |
| 021 | [ Fabric cleanroom wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for stainless steel, transparent plastic and acrylic cabinets, isolators, curtains ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRONOVA MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named NOVAHOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 28, 2022 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |