USPTO serial 78886707
Serial No. 78886707
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with Serial No. 78886707?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Singapore, SG
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Olosky
Patricia A. Olosky The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, jams, almond confectionery; biscuits; bread; gingerbread; bread rolls; buns; cake paste; cakes; flavorings for cakes other than essential oils; rice cakes; candy for food; chocolate; cookies; edible decorations for cakes; confectionery fondants; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; fruit jellies; meat pies; noodles; pancakes; pastries; pasties; peanut confectionery; pies; pizzas; pralines; puddings; sandwiches; sugar confectionery; sushi; sweetmeats; tarts; waffles; mooncakes; dumplings; tea cakes; breakfast cakes; sauces; chili sauces and pastes; seasonings; soya sauces; spices; condiments, namely, chutney, honey, ketchup, mustard | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Cafe services; cafeteria services; canteen services; catering services; cocktail lounge services; restaurants; self-service restaurant services; snack-bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Jade Culinary Concepts Holding Pte. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |