USPTO serial 78887040
AIM TO PLEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIM TO PLEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Arnold Jr.
PATRICK J ARNOLD JR MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST FL 34CHICAGO, IL 60661-4544UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Gourmet foods, namely, hors d'oeuvres in the nature of tenderloin of beef tapenades, potato nests, crab cakes, pork shoi mi, Chinese barbeque baked pork bao, baked Thai style chicken and vegetable bao | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Gourmet foods, namely, desserts in the nature of miniature deluxe cheesecakes and pastries; specialty sandwiches; and hors d'oeuvres in the nature of mini brioche of beef steak sandwiches, mini reubens, chicken pot stickers, dark chicken wonton, shrimp and pork egg rolls, southwest style burritos, chicken and black bean egg rolls, vegetable and cheese quesadillas, tostaditas, canapés, and tapas in the nature of beef empanada, reuben in a pastry, pepperoni and pork sausage pizza roll, southwestern chicken burrito, and southwestern bean burrito | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |