USPTO serial 78887115
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
Mark Lerner Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP230 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfuming preparations for the atmosphere not in the nature of aromatherapy, namely, perfume sprays and perfumes for the home | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles, fragranced or scented candles not in the nature of aromatherapy; candle wicks | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Air freshening preparations; air purifying preparations in the nature of deodorants and deodorizers for the room and in the air; room air fresheners; preparations for perfuming or fragrancing the air in the nature of air fresheners; preparations for neutralizing odors for use on carpeting and textiles and for use in the air, none of the foregoing in the nature of aromatherapy | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus and instruments, namely, electric and battery operated units all used for scenting, purifying or freshening the atmosphere not in the nature of aromatherapy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named AURA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |