USPTO serial 78887273
CHARMD'LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARMD'LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary B. Chapman
Gary B. Chapman GREENLEE, WINNER & SULLIVAN, P.C.4875 PEARL EAST CIR STE 200BOULDER, CO 80301-6103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Seafood and food products derived from sea animals and sea plants, namely, processed seafood and fish that are not living, namely, dried fish and shellfish; fish cake; fish fillets; canned and bottled fishery products, namely, canned tuna; edible isinglass, namely unflavored and unsweetened gelatin made from fish; smoked fish and shellfish; snake fish; stingray; flatfish; crayfish; hair-tail; crab; mackerel; whales; dried flatfish; oyster; oyster-clam; mackerel pike; small octopuses; flounder; marlin; perch; codfish; salted cod roe; clams; sea breams; dolphins; gold bream; dried herring roe; anchovy; Alaska pollack; octopus; loach; short-necked clams; yellowtails; large-eyed herring; eels; pomfret; sand smelt; swellfish; black rock fish; Crucian carps; congers; Spanish mackerel; sharks; shrimps; sand dollars; salted sand dollars roe; salted salmon roe; spiny turban shell; mullet; edible frogs; Dybowskiis sand eel; salmon; squid; sea squirt; sweetfish; carp; soft-shelled turtles; saurel; abalones; gizzard shad; sardines; shellfish; yellow corvine; slender shad; filefish; tuna fish; spearfish; herrings; caviar; sea-cucumbers; skate; sea mussel and swordfish | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Television advertising services; Internet advertising services; retail store services in the field of health auxiliary foods; distributorship services in the field of health auxiliary foods; import-export agencies; management and advisory services for business; business research services; modeling services for sales promotion; direct mail advertising services; sales promotion services; procurement services for other business, namely purchasing food for others; retail store services in the field of processed food; retail store services in the field of processed sea food; distributorship services in the field of processed sea food; retail store services in the field of fish jelly product; distributorship services in the field of fish jelly product; restaurant chain services, namely, restaurant franchising | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Japanese restaurant services; buffet restaurant services; snack counter services; Korean restaurant services; Chinese restaurant services; resting room services, namely temporary rental of rooms for resting; snack-bar services; food cooking agency services, namely restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YOON, Myoung Keun
- Other trademarks owned by YOON, Myoung Keun
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHARMD'LITE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |