USPTO serial 78887406
NEO-MODAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEO-MODAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Gregory Schivley/Jessica S. Sachs
G GREGORY SCHIVLEY/JESSICA S SACHS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLC5445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098-2617UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | mental health software, namely, interactive intelligent, multi-media software for use in association with psychological education and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |