USPTO serial 78887672
FIDDLEHEADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIDDLEHEADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE A ROLSTON
45 SHEPPARD AVE ESTE 900TORONTO ON, M2N 6W9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BackFocus chart; Black and white test pattern for testing back focus on high-end digital cameras; Spiral lines increase in width gradually from very thin to 90 to 100 times the width on the outermost spiral; The space between the lines increases at the same rate as does that of the lines; Side by side spirals enable the user to determine critical back-focus with a digital camera | ACTIVE | Apr 24, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |