CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PEER 1 INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78887919

PEER 1 INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3306975Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PEER 1 INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNE E. YATES

ANNE E. YATES TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST STE 5200BANK OF AMERICA PLZATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Customer server co-location, namely, providing physically secure power protected data centers for housing network equipment; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, data recovery services, data filtering and sorting, and data warehousing; customer system support consisting of monitoring of network systems, providing back up computer programs and facilities including emergency power backup for customer servers, and troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical support services, namely, remote or onsite trouble shooting of computer hardware and software problems; providing back-up computer programs, services and facilities; remote or onsite monitoring of computer systems; data encryption services; computer security monitoring and security monitoring of computer access to the InternetSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 17, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 12, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Nov 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 27, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance