USPTO serial 78888030
DANNON DRINKABLES GOOD TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANNON DRINKABLES GOOD TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
PERLA M. KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Yogurt, yogurt-based beverages; dairy-based snack foods, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; dairy-based beverages, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices and fruit drinks; fruit-based beverages with yogurt; smoothies; soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |