USPTO serial 78888229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath gel; Bath lotion; Bath milks; Bubble bath; Cosmetics; Eau de cologne ; Fragrances for personal use; Hair care preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair gel; Liquid bath soaps; Perfume; Shampoos; Toilet soap; Toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglasses; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Sports eyewear; Sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Clocks; Jewelry; Pet jewelry; Watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; Athletic bags; Attache cases; Backpacks; Beach bags; Billfolds; Briefcase-type portfolios; Briefcases; Business card cases; Business cases; Carry-all bags; Carrying cases; Cosmetic cases sold empty; Credit card cases; Duffel bags; Handbags; Key case; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather cases; Luggage; Luggage tags; Purses; Tote bags; Umbrellas; Wallets; Wine bags with handles for carrying or holding wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware; Cake servers; Coasters not of paper and not being table linen; Coffee pots not of precious metal; Comb cases; Combs; Cookware, namely pots and pans; Dishes; Hair brushes; Hair combs; Ice buckets; Non-electric coffee servers not of precious metal; Serving forks; Serving spoons; Serving tongs; Toothbrush holders; Wine buckets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath linen; Bath towels; Bed blankets; Bed canopies; Bed linen; Bed sheets; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Comforters; Curtains; Feather beds; Flannel; Textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; Textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; Upholstery fabrics; Wash cloths; Washing mitts | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | "Computerized online ordering featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; Mail order services featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; On-line retail store services featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; Retail stores featuring a general merchandise and general consumer goods," in class 35. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |