USPTO serial 78888346
APPROVED BY PARENTS, LOVED BY KIDS, PROTECTED BY PIXKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPROVED BY PARENTS, LOVED BY KIDS, PROTECTED BY PIXKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence R. Hefter
Laurence R. Hefter Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, operating system programs and utilities, word processing programs, address book programs, calculator programs, terminal emulation programs, programs for downloading and playing audio and video, programs for managing computer power supplies, programs for use in transmitting data between computers and other electronic devices, computer maintenance programs, programs for use in accessing and playing CDs, programs for use in accessing and viewing DVDs, browser programs, paint programs; electronic mail programs; programs for electronic conferencing; computers and parts therefor, computer peripherals, and full line of computer application programs; computers and parts therefor, computer peripherals, computer programs, and manuals therefor sold as a unit, for use in applications with graphical user interfaces; computer servers; operating system programs therefore and a full line of computer application programs for use therewith; computer programs for managing communications and data exchange between computers and electronic devices; computer hardware and peripherals; computer keyboards; computer and video game joysticks and game controllers; computer game pads and controllers; computer peripherals, namely, computer mice and other pointing devices; computer software for playing video games and computer games; computer software for adaptive training of the user, incorporating real-time interface of the user with realistic environments under changing conditions guided by the software in response to user actions and choices;computer antivirus software; internet security software; intrusion detection software; firewall software; privacy control software; content filtering software; computer software for the creation of a virtual private network; computer utility software for removal of computer applications and software; computer software and downloadable computer software for use in updating other computer software; computer software for use in networking applications, namely, communications software for connecting computer network users; computer software for providing security to remote computer users, computer software for file management and transfer; computer hardware appliances that provide firewall, content filtering, intrusion alert, virus protection, virtual private networking and other security functions; user manuals supplied with all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electronic educational game machines; learning toys for children; equipment sold as a unit for playing electronic games with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; electronic action toys; hand held unit for playing electronic games; and hand held unit for playing video games. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images and documents via computer terminals; electronic mail services; and facsimile transmission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STELOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STELOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named APPROVED BY PARENTS, LOVED BY KIDS, PROTECTED BY PIXKEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 21, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 4, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |