USPTO serial 78889060
URBAN SURVIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URBAN SURVIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Johnson
Sean D. Johnson INGRASSIA, FISHER & LORENZ P.C.7150 E CAMELBACK RD STE 325SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-1225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Modified automobiles and recreational vehicles and accessories therefor, namely, anti-theft devices for automobiles and vehicles, automobile bumpers, roof racks, grill housings and covers, brake upgrade kits consisting of calipers, brake rotors and brake pads, wheels for land vehicles, tires, secondary fuel tanks, motor car windows, spare tire carriers for vehicles, front push bars, skid rails, namely, metal beams for the underside of vehicles, and protective plates for automobiles and recreational vehicles, namely, metal plates to protect the drivetrain of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |