USPTO serial 78889167
HIMALAYA PURE HERBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIMALAYA PURE HERBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
George Town, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert T. Maldonado
Robert T. Maldonado Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicinal Herbs in dried or preserved form, and medicinal herb extracts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |