CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MEDVANTAGE

USPTO serial 78889558

MEDVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Johnson Walden

Cynthia Johnson Walden FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to analyze costs, frequency and appropriateness of medical services prior to payment of insurance claims and instruction manuals all sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 22, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance