Drawing for MODBOOK

USPTO serial 78889679

MODBOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODBOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Mark Holland

J MARK HOLLAND J MARK HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES3 SAN JOAQUIN PLZ STE 210NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-5943UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer game hardware, peripherals, and accessories, namely computer game discs, computer game joysticks, computer keyboards, computer mice, computer game cassettes; computer game peripherals; computer game software and programsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Nov 5, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 5, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 10, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 6, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 4, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 6, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 17, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 13, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2008INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Nov 6, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 3, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Feb 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 30, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 25, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 25, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance