USPTO serial 78889682
Serial No. 78889682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78889682?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Playa Del Ray, CA
Playa Del Ray, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Mark Holland
J. MARK HOLLAND J. MARK HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES3 SAN JOAQUIN PLZ STE 210NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-5943UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research, development, leasing of consumer electronics and computer hardware; research and development of computer software; maintenance, update, upgrade and repair of computer software; consultation, design, testing, research and technical consulting services for consumer electronics, computer hardware, computer software; hosting web sites and providing web site operation and management services to others; providing search engines for obtaining data on computer networks and global communication networks; providing information concerning consumer electronics, computer hardware, and computer software over wired, wireless and cellular, local and global, computer, data and communication networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |