USPTO serial 78889688
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Capo d'Orlando (ME), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Franco A. Serafini
FRANCO A SERAFINI Themis Law7825 Fay Ave Ste 200LA JOLLA, CA 92037-4270UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely pumps; Machine parts, namely coupling and transmission implements; Couplings for machines; Agricultural implements, namely components for water distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Agricultural irrigation units; Irrigation spray nozzles; Irrigation sprinklers; Water pumps for irrigation systems; Dripper irrigation systems, comprised of valves, regulators, and couplings; Pipes for irrigation systems; Water fountains | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Rubber for use in the manufacture of sprinkler systems; Plastic conduit for drainage and irrigation; Plastic conduit for irrigation; Plastic in extruded form for general industrial use; Flexible pipes, not of metal; Plastic pipes for irrigation; Pipe joint compound; Pipe joint sealant; Pipe muffs, not of metal, for use with non-metal pipes; Irrigation hoses; Plastic in extruded form for general industrial use; Non-metal pipe couplings and joints | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |