Drawing for HITAPE

USPTO serial 78889688

HITAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HITAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Franco A. Serafini

FRANCO A SERAFINI Themis Law7825 Fay Ave Ste 200LA JOLLA, CA 92037-4270UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely pumps; Machine parts, namely coupling and transmission implements; Couplings for machines; Agricultural implements, namely components for water distributionACTIVE
011Agricultural irrigation units; Irrigation spray nozzles; Irrigation sprinklers; Water pumps for irrigation systems; Dripper irrigation systems, comprised of valves, regulators, and couplings; Pipes for irrigation systems; Water fountainsACTIVE
017Rubber for use in the manufacture of sprinkler systems; Plastic conduit for drainage and irrigation; Plastic conduit for irrigation; Plastic in extruded form for general industrial use; Flexible pipes, not of metal; Plastic pipes for irrigation; Pipe joint compound; Pipe joint sealant; Pipe muffs, not of metal, for use with non-metal pipes; Irrigation hoses; Plastic in extruded form for general industrial use; Non-metal pipe couplings and jointsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance