Drawing for INTELLIFINDER

USPTO serial 78890455

INTELLIFINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIFINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise I. Mroz

Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLPCira Centre, 12th Floor2929 Arch StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for searching databases for information, namely, for text retrieval, for locating, compiling, identifying, clusterizing, hierarchically prioritizing, verifying and cross-referencing, using natural language queries, keywords, and Boolean operators; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network, namely, text retrieval, for locating, compiling, identifying, clusterizing, hierarchically prioritizing, verifying and cross-referencing, using natural language queries, keywords, and Boolean operatorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Mar 4, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 3, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 10, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 9, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 7, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 6, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 24, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Feb 5, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 3, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 25, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 25, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance