Drawing for FRONTIER FIRST

USPTO serial 78890776

FRONTIER FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRONTIER FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison L. Rapp

ALLISON L RAPP LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1233 20TH ST NWSUITE 703WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Direct response retail services by means of telephone, Internet, and face-to-face contact, all featuring telecommunications hardware and software, computer networking hardware and software, telecommunications serrvice plans, and telecommunications service activation; promoting the telecommunications hardware and software of others; promoting the computer networking hardware and software of others; business consulting services in the field of selection, implementation, and use of telecommunications networks, telecommunications serice plans, and computer networks for the purpose of maximizing operational efficiencyACTIVE
037Installation, maintenance, and repair of telecommunications and computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 18, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance