Drawing for THE ARCHITECT OF LIFE SETTLEMENTS

USPTO serial 78891211

THE ARCHITECT OF LIFE SETTLEMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ARCHITECT OF LIFE SETTLEMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Scott Peden

R SCOTT PEDEN204 WOODHEW DRWACO, TX 76712-6529UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Viatical settlement servicesACTIVEMay 17, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 12, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 10, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 7, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 17, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 18, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 18, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 12, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance