USPTO serial 78891458
RED DIGITAL CINEMA CAMERA COMPANY EST. 1999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED DIGITAL CINEMA CAMERA COMPANY EST. 1999?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eastsound, WA
Eastsound, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Robertson Kaufman
JANET ROBERTSON KAUFMAN WEEKS, KAUFMAN, NELSON & JOHNSON462 STEVENS AVE STE 310SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital cinema camera systems and accessories, sold individually or as a unit, comprised of, cameras, camera lenses, flash memory cards, electronic memories, hard drives for video recorders, video monitors and flat panel display screens, all for use in the creation, storage, delivery, manipulation, recording, playback or viewing of video, music, graphics, photos, audio, text, and multimedia data; cinematographic projectors; photographic projectors; slide projectors; computer programs for digital cinema cameras, audio and visual educational and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still image and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications, computer white boards, video projectors and video display monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Rental of cinematographic machines and apparatus, namely, rental of cinema equipment and systems for use in the creation, storage, delivery, manipulation, recording, playback or viewing of video, music, graphics, photos, audio, text, multimedia, computer programs and data in a specified image format | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of new technology for others in the field of image format technology relating to the dissemination, broadcast or transmission of video, music, graphics, photos, audio, text, multimedia, computer programs and data in a specified image format; technology consultation in the filed of image format technology relating to the dissemination, broadcast or transmission of video, music, graphics, photos, audio, text, multimedia, computer programs and data in a specified image format | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Red.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Red.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RED DIGITAL CINEMA CAMERA COMPANY EST. 1999
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |