USPTO serial 78891490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie C. VanDerZanden
JULIE C. VANDERZANDEN K-2 CORPORATION4201 6TH AVE SSEATTLE, WA 98108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | aprons; athletic uniforms; athletic shoes; baby buntings; bandannas; beanies; belts; bicycle shirts; bicycle shorts; blouses; booties; caps; cargo pants; children's headwear; convertible pants; coveralls; dress shirts; dresses; ear muffs; footwear; garters; gloves; hats; headwear; hiking boots; hiking pants; hiking shoes; hosiery; infant sleepers; jackets; jeans; jerseys; jumpers; leg warmers; lingerie; mittens; neckties; negligees; pajamas; pants and trousers; parkas; ponchos; pram suits; robes; running shoes; sandals; scarves; shawls; shirts; shoes; shorts; skirts; slacks; sleepwear; slips; snowmobile suits; socks; sun visors; sunsuits; suspenders; sweat pants; sweatbands; sweaters; sweatshirts; swimsuits; swimwear; tank tops; tennis shoes; thermal pants; thermal shirts; thermal underwear; ties; tights; track pants; training suits; t-shirts; underwear; vests; visors; wind resistant jackets; wristbands; infant and toddler one piece clothing; footwear; baseball shoes; beach shoes; canvas shoes; deck shoes; football shoes; golf shoes; infants' shoes and boots; soccer shoes; training shoes; track and field shoes; work shoes and boots; thongs; slippers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |