Drawing for COCINA CASERA PERFORMANCE LOAF

USPTO serial 78891580

COCINA CASERA PERFORMANCE LOAF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCINA CASERA PERFORMANCE LOAF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL KING & SPALDING LLP1180 PEACHTREE STREETATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pasteurized CheeseACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 30, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 17, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 12, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 12, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 2, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 1, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance