USPTO serial 78893144
AQUAJETT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUAJETT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I Rozsa
ERIK M. PELTON ERIK M. PELTON & ASSOCIATES, PLLCP. O. BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental instruments, namely, oral irrigators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |