USPTO serial 78893700
ESTHETIK BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTHETIK BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; essential oils; make-up; suntanning preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations for the body, the face, eyes, lips, neck, bust, hands, legs, feet; depilatories; shaving preparations; nail polish; nail varnish; nail polish base coat; nail varnish remover; cuticle removing preparations; revitalizing lotions for the nails, namely, nail care preparations; make up remover; pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; shampoos ; hair lotions; hair care preparations; perfumery products, namely, perfume, perfume water, cologne water, toilet water, personal deodorant, home fragrances except sprays; sachets for perfuming linen; room fragrances namely scented stones, scented wood, potpourris, incense; dentifrice | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, a work counter upon which beauty care services will be provided, namely, face tanning, make-up, manicure, face express care, application of false nails and false eyelashes | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Aesthetic care services, namely, cosmetic body care services, depilatory hair removal services and manicure services; hairdressing salons, beauty salons; manicure salons, massage, beauty salons featuring beauty care, and consultation in the fields of make-up, cosmetics, and perfumery consultation; nutritional consultancy, namely, dietary and nutritional guidance; balneotherapy consultancy, namely, medical consultation concerning the treatment of disease by bathing; providing health information; medical testing services, namely, fitness evaluation; health spa services, namely, aromatherapy services, thalassotherapy services, balneotherapy services, sound therapy, and chromatherapy, namely, colour and light therapies, all for health and wellness of body and spirit offered at a health resort; operation of sauna facilities; hammams, namely, providing bath houses; baths fitted with pressure jets, namely, providing of hot tub facilities; dermo-pigmentation cares, namely, tattooing; relaxation therapy in the nature of autogenous training; natural medicine services, namely, medical services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lallement, Frantz
- Other trademarks owned by Lallement, Frantz
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ESTHETIK BAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |