Drawing for CONSEJO

USPTO serial 78894138

CONSEJO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSEJO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES F. GOSSETT

JAMES F GOSSETT ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ RM 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-3910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing business and consumer information services in the field of computer hardware and softwareACTIVEJun 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 29, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 4, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 4, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance