USPTO serial 78894434
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin S. Gittes
Masrvin S. Gittes Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo666 3Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toiletries, skin creams and perfume | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | Metal rings and chains for keys | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | Flatware and cutlery | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry and watches; leather jewelry boxes | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, note paper, notepads, stationery, greeting cards and postcards, brochures in the field of hotel, restaurant and catering services, envelopes, letterhead, paper napkins, and books in the field of cooking and history; pens and pencils; paper | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | Leather goods, namely, hand bags, briefcases, suitcases, luggage trunks, luggage, wallets, travel bags, boxes, hatboxes for travel, garment bags, wallets, credit card holders, purses and bags | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Home furnishings, namely, chairs, tables, couches, stools, and wooden boxes; pillows | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Housewares, namely, dishes, drinking glasses; glassware, namely glass bowls, glass beverageware; vases | ABANDONED | — |
| 022 | Packaging bags and sacks made of textile material | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | Fabrics, textiles and textile goods, namely, linen, cotton fabric, towels, bed linen, table linen, throws, napkins, duvets, place mats and blankets | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, pants, robes, hats, belts; shoes and slippers; leather belts; leather hats; bath robes | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings, carpets and rugs | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Games, namely, board games, card games, and playing cards | ABANDONED | — |
| 034 | Ceramic ashtrays | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail gift shops | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |