USPTO serial 78894466
0-60
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 0-60?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver R. Chernin
OLIVER R CHERNIN MCLAUGHLIN & STERN LLP260 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-2401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring information and news in the field of automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |