USPTO serial 78897750
WRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. PoDmarin
Daniel L. PoDmarin BõnWrx Inc1507 W. PARKSIDE LNPHOENIX, AZ 85027-1335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Biocompatible preparations consisting of polymers, namely, for filling of cavities, voids and defects in bone, in vivo bone repair, attaching damaged or severed tendons or ligaments, securing of prosthetic devices, bone substitutes for surgical use, synthetic filler to serve as replacement for bone; biocompatible preparations consisting of polymers, namely, polymers to promote the regeneration of damaged or severed nerves and the regeneration of tissue, muscle, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, devices for percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty; medical devices, namely, devices for disc augmentation; medical devices and components of medical devices for filling bone voids and the repair of bone defects and bone fractures, namely, injection systems consisting of dispensers, containers of material and mixers for dispensing material for filling or repairing of bone and bone voids; systems consisting of dispensers, mixers and containers of material or mixing and dispensing bone filler material, mixing and dispensing cartridges for bone filler materials, mixing and dispensing syringes for bone filler materials, pre-filled bone filler material dispensing cartridges and syringes, needles, tubing and other components therefor; medical devices, namely, devices for in vivo drug delivery; medical devices, namely, devices for transdermal drug delivery; medical devices, namely, devices for attaching damaged or severed tendons or ligaments: medical devices, namely, devices that promote the regeneration of damaged or severed nerves and the regeneration of tissue, muscle, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, skin; medical devices, namely, synthetic nerve tubes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |