USPTO serial 78898017
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; poultry and game; sea foods, namely, fish, shrimp, lobster, pomfret and trout; fruit and vegetables, all being preserved, dried, cooked or processed; preparations made from all the aforesaid goods, namely, jams, pickles and marmalades; dairy products; drinks made from dairy products, namely, drinks based on yogurt; soups; and dips. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rice, pasta; breakfast or processed cereal and cereal preparations, namely, cereal based snack food; tea, coffee, cocoa; coffee essences used for flavoring; coffee extracts used for flavoring; mixtures of coffee and chicory, chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; beverages, namely, chocolate based, coffee based, cocoa based, tea based; pastries, cakes, biscuits, ices, ice cream; ice cream products and chilled desserts, namely, frozen fruit desserts, ice desserts, ice-cream desserts and non-dairy frozen desserts; frozen confections, sorbets, bread; mousses, namely puddings; sweet spreads, particularly jams, peanut butter and honey; savoury spreads, namely, almond butter spread, hazelnut butter spread and crunchy peanut butter spread; foodstuffs in the form of snacks, including crisp bread snacks, fruit cake snacks, flour based savory snacks, rice cake snacks and snacks manufactured from cereals; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; sweet pies, chocolate; sauces including toppings for ice cream and desserts, namely, chocolate topping, marshmallow topping and topping syrup; pizzas, pizza bases, sauces, sauces for pasta and rice; salad dressings, mayonnaise, and frozen yoghurt. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |