Drawing for SCOPE7

USPTO serial 78902302

SCOPE7

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOPE7?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Feldman

JONATHAN FELDMAN MAGASINN & FELDMAN4640 ADMIRALTY WAY STE 402MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292-6617UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting service in the fields of print, electronic and digital media communicationsACTIVE—
041Services in the field of digital media, namely, production of DVDs, CDs, DVRs, and production of sound, music and video recordings for use on digital audio and visual devices for othersACTIVE—
042Services in the field of digital media, namely, designing and developing educational and entertainment computer game programs recorded on DVDs, CDs, DVRs, and designing and developing digital audio and visual devices for others; designing, developing, implementing and maintaining websites of others for the global computer network; animation design services for others, namely, illustration and graphic design for digital media, namely DVDs, CDs, DVRs, and digital audio and visual devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance