USPTO serial 78903303
PIT BULLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIT BULLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of baseball games; Entertainment services in the nature of professional and amateur sports, namely, baseball games, basketball games, football games, hockey games, soccer games softball games, rugby games and lacrosse games; Entertainment in the nature of golf tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of tennis tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of track and field competitions; Entertainment in the nature of weight lifting competitions; Entertainment in the nature of wrestling contests; Entertainment in the nature of gymnastic performances; Entertainment in the nature of volleyball tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of bowling tournaments Entertainment in the nature of racquetballs, handballs, squash, badminton, roller derby, billiards, pool tournaments, table tennis; Health club services, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; Operation of sports camps in the nature of basketball, football, hockey, baseball, soccer, lacrosse and softball camps; Personal training services, namely, strength and conditioning training; Physical education services; Providing animal exercise services; Providing information in the field of exercise training; Providing recreational areas in the nature of children's play areas; and providing facilities for recreational activities; fan clubs; providing on-line newsletters in the field of sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GORDON, CARL
- Other trademarks owned by GORDON, CARL
- Other trademarks owned by GORDON, MAE
- Other trademarks owned by GORDON, MAE
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PIT BULLS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PDMS | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |