USPTO serial 78904664
GIRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dermot Horgan, Jeannine Haas and Gary Saposnik
DERMOT HORGAN, ET AL IPHorgan Ltd.1130 LAKE COOK RD STE 240BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely, sports balls of all types, toy rubber balls, golf balls, basketballs, footballs, soccer balls, volleyballs, tennis balls, racquetballs, squash balls, handballs, baseballs and softballs; baseball, cricket, softball and table tennis bats; cue, field hockey, ice hockey, street hockey, lacrosse and ski sticks and replacement parts thereof for sports and fitness activities; golf clubs; baseball and softball pitching machines, grip tape for baseball, cricket, softball and table tennis bats, racquets, golf clubs and cue, field hockey, ice hockey, street hockey, lacrosse and ski sticks; basketball backboards, snowboards and snowboard bindings; skateboards; exercise weights, ankle weights for exercise, hand weights for exercise, weight lifting belts, aerobic boxing gloves; golf club head covers, golf bags, golf bag tags, golf tees, golf balls, golf ball markers, shoulder straps for golf bags, divot repair tools; in-line, roller and ice skates and replacement parts thereof; hand grips for golf clubs, baseball, softball and cricket bats, field hockey sticks, ice hockey sticks, lacrosse sticks and sports rackets, namely, tennis, squash, racquetball and badminton rackets, mitts and gloves for the practice of all types of sports, namely, for, baseball, softball, golf, soccer, football, skiing, lacrosse, street hockey, field hockey, ice hockey, racquetball and squash; safety padding and safety cushioning used in sports facilities and on equipment for basketball, baseball, football, soccer, hockey, lacrosse, ice skating, inline skating, cricket, volleyball, and in gymnasiums and playgrounds; kickboards, and ring buoys for recreational and sport training use; racquets for playing tennis, racquetball, squash and badminton; guts and strings for tennis, squash and racquetball rackets, namely, bumpers, grommets, grips, and strings and covers for tennis, squash and racquetball rackets; bags specifically adapted to sports equipment, namely, bat bags; ice and roller skates, skis and ski equipment, namely, skis and ski sticks; face masks for sports and fitness activities, namely, field hockey, street hockey, ice hockey, baseball, football and lacrosse; protective padding, mouth and shin guards, supporters and body protectors for sports and fitness activities, namely, ice hockey, street hockey, field hockey, baseball, football, soccer, basketball, tennis, squash, racquetball, lacrosse and skiing; lacrosse stick heads and replacement parts thereof, lacrosse gloves, lacrosse arm pads, lacrosse shoulder pads, lacrosse rib pads, lacrosse chest protectors, lacrosse goals, lacrosse nets; soccer goalkeeper gloves, soccer shin guards, soccer goals, soccer nets; field hockey gloves, field hockey shin guards, field hockey goals, field hockey nets; volleyball nets; sports protective pads for various parts of the body, namely, shoulder pads, chest pads, and thigh pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |