USPTO serial 78907380
SILVER STONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILVER STONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RD STE A213PHOENIX, AZ 85012-1287UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, JACKETS, JERSEYS, SHORTS, PANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, SANDALS, SNEAKERS, BOOTS, SHOES, SOCKS, DRESSES, UNDERGARMENTS, TIES, SWEATERS, DRESSES; SWIM WEAR, NAMELY, BATHING SUITS, BATHING TRUNKS, AND BIKINIS | ABANDONED | Jun 12, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |