USPTO serial 78910289
FLOORLINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3438639Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOORLINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH
POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
CLEVELAND, OH
POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Irvine, CA
POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
IRVINE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
Brian E. Turung FAY SHARPE LLPTHE HALLE BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR1228 EUCLID AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Sheeting, namely, self-adhesive, slip-resistant, plastic sheet floor coverings to protect hard floor surfaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SURFACE SHIELDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POLY-TAK PROTECTION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named FLOORLINER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |