Drawing for GOLDEN CLASSIC

USPTO serial 78917589

GOLDEN CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rene M. LaForte

RENE M LAFORTE THOMPSON HINE LLP10 W 2ND ST2000 COURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029BaconACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 14, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 31, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 10, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 10, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 10, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 10, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance