Drawing for MAXFLEX

USPTO serial 78926485

MAXFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAXFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arne I. Fors

ARNE I. FORS; GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON GOWLIN LAFLEU HENDERSON100 KING STREET WEST1 FIRST CANADIAN PLACETORONTO, ON M5X 1G5

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, clampsABANDONEDJun 13, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 5, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 5, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 5, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jun 16, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 11, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 15, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 15, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 18, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jul 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance