USPTO serial 78928308
CRYOLIPOLYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3987356Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 28, 2011
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYOLIPOLYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K. EBLING THOMPSON HINE LLP312 WALNUT ST STE 1400CINCINNATI, OH 45202-4029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, including diagnostic and treatment services related to the destruction of fat cells in human beings; medical consultations related to the destruction of fat cells in human beings | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZELTIQ AESTHETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZELTIQ AESTHETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Juniper Medical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Juniper Medical, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CRYOLIPOLYSIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 16, 2018 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 23, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |