USPTO serial 78930180
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Glenview, IL
Glenview, IL
TWO RIVERS, WI
DENMARK, WI
DENMARK, WI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Dietary food supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements for human consumption; Food for diabetics; Food supplements; Food supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; Meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; Meal replacement bars; Meal replacement drinks; Meal replacement powders; Meal replacement shakes; Mineral nutritional supplements; Mineral supplements; Mixed vitamin preparations; Multi-vitamin preparations; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; Nutritional additives for use in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; Nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Nutritional oils not for cosmetic purposes; Nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; Nutritional supplements; Nutritionally fortified beverages; Nutritionally fortified water | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |