USPTO serial 78930879
EVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRENE K. CHONG
IRENE K. CHONG MATTEL, INC.333 CONTINENTAL BLVD.M1-1518EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, TOY FIGURES, PLAY FIGURES, ACTION FIGURES, DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING, DOLL STYLING HEADS, TOY VEHICLES, TOY VEHICLE TRACK SETS, AND PLAYSETS FOR CHILDREN, NAMELY, DOLLS, TOY FIGURES, DOLL CLOTHING, DOLL FURNITURE AND DOLL FURNITURE ACCESSORIES AND CASES FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING; BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, MEMORY GAMES, PARLOR GAMES, ACTION SKILL GAMES, ARCADE GAMES, LCD GAME MACHINES, ELECTRONIC HAND-HELD GAMES WITH LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS, PUZZLES; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES AND MEMORY GAMES; ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN; PLUSH TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, BENDABLE TOYS, BATH TOYS, CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, CONSTRUCTION TOYS, DRAWING TOYS, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS, FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS, INFANT TOYS, INFLATABLE TOYS, MECHANICAL TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, POP UP TOYS, PULL TOYS, PUSH TOYS, RIDE-ON TOYS, SAND TOYS, SQUEEZE TOYS, TALKING TOYS, LEVER ACTION TOYS, WIND-UP TOYS, TOY BOXES, TOY FURNITURE, PUPPETS, CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS, CHRISTMAS TREE DECORATIONS, JUMP ROPES, SPORT BALLS, BALLOONS, YO-YOS, FLYING DISCS, KITES AND TOY WIND SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |