Drawing for NETWORKDNA

USPTO serial 78935979

NETWORKDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETWORKDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel, Esq.

SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer peripherals; computer network server software, namely, software for use in network and application identification and performance analysis; computer network performance management software; computer utility programs; computer programs for use in local area network applications in to manage the performance of the network, device and application elements of distributed IT environments; and instruction manuals sold in connection therewith; downloadable electronic publications, namely, manuals, white papers, and books in the fields of technology, the Internet, intranets, computers, computer network management, computer servers, computer hardware, and computer softwareACTIVE
016Printed materials and publications, namely, manuals, white papers, brochures, pamphlets, booklets, newsletters, data sheets, and books in the fields of technology, the Internet, intranets, computers, computer network management, computer servers, computer hardware, computer softwareACTIVE
042Consulting services in the fields of computer software, computer network performance; monitoring of intranet and Internet site performanceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 20, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 29, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jul 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance