USPTO serial 78936579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Central Milton Keynes, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C Eisenhart
JOHN C EISENHART KED & ASSOCIATES, LLPPO BOX 221200CHANTILLY, VA 20153-1200UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, business management services, business administration services; advertising services, namely, creating corporate and brand identity for others; design of brand names; services relating to the creation of trademarks, trade names and domain names; development, planning, management and investigation of business and marketing strategy; business advisory services relating to product development; business advisory services relating to new business ideas and models; market analysis and research services; collection and provision of information relating to market analysis and research; business research services; commercial information research services; business research services to identify business partners, suppliers, customers and investors; indexing and distributing advertising and publicity information materials including leaflets, brochures, flyers, samples and printed matter; creating indexes of information, websites and other information sources; advisory services relating to taxation; marketing and promotional services; advertising services; accounting services; tax consultancy; franchising consultancy services in business management, organization and promotion; personnel management and consultancy; organizing, preparing and negotiating licensing agreements and advising on all aspects of licensing, including franchising; advice in procuring the aforesaid services; and information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, financial advice and consultancy services; financial analysis, due diligence and consultation; investment advisory services; preparation of financial projections; insurance agency and brokerage services; financial advisory, consultancy, information and research services; providing financing to emerging and start-up companies; and information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design services, namely, design of new products for others; product development services; preparation of reports relating to the design and development of products; research relating to the design and development of new products; legal services; legal searching and research services; legal and advisory services relating to the protection and exploitation of intellectual property; licensing of intellectual property; project management services, namely, providing advice and guidance to others to help develop new business ideas and concepts; arbitration services; advice in how to procure business and financial services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |