Drawing for SERVER TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78937112

SERVER TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3305028Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SERVER TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry H. Tronco

Larry H. Tronco Holland & Hart, LLPPO Box 8749Denver, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical power distribution units for data center equipment cabinetsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 2, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 20138.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 19, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 28, 2007PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance