USPTO serial 78944902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SABRINA J. HUDSON
SABRINA J. HUDSON H. J. HEINZ COMPANYP. O. BOX 57PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Baby food; baby formula | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Cranberry sauce; applesauce; instant or pre-cooked soup; soup mixes; jams; meat and fish pastes and spreads; meat extracts; dried vegetables; dried fruits; preserved fruits; preserved vegetables; canned vegetables; canned fruits; meat jellies; meat juices; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; pates; hazelnut spreads; peanut butter; jellies; potato chips; frozen vegetables; pickled vegetables; processed fruit; candied fruit; crystallized fruit; fruit chips; fruit conserves; fruit pastes; fruit pectin; fruit peels; fruit preserves; fruit pulps; fruit rinds; candied fruit snacks; fruit toppings; fruit based spreads; frozen fruits; unprocessed fruits preserved in alcohol; cooking oil; edible oil; salad oil; vegetable oil; olive oil; processed olives; vegetable pastes; dairy based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt, namely, cheese based snack foods; fruit based snack foods; fruit salads; garden salads; vegetable salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Meat sauces; marinades; dipping sauces; dressings for fruit; pizza sauces; barbeque sauces; cheese based sauces; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; pasta sauces; vegetable sauces; fish sauces; seafood sauces; poultry sauces; dessert sauces; mayonnaise; vinaigrettes; salsa; chutney; mustard; dry seasoning mixes for gravy, spaghetti, stews and fajitas; spices for meat, fish, and poultry, namely, wet rubs; spice mixes; splashes, namely, meat sauces; sizzlers, namely, meat sauces; bread dips; brushetta; fruit coulis; meat and fish sauces in the nature of relishes; pasta; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; pastries; rolls; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; biscuits; cookies; crackers; chocolate spreads; bread; pies; cakes; sugar confectionery, namely, crystal sugar pieces; candy; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate bars; puddings; macaroni; muffins; chocolate muffins; cakes, namely, swiss rolls; brownies; tarts; bread sticks; vinegar; ketchup; tomato sauces; caramel coated popcorn; caramel coated peanuts; cereal based snack foods; corn chips; pita chips; tortilla chips; rice based snack foods; wheat based snack foods; macaroni salads; pasta salads; rice salad | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh vegetables; fresh fruits; unprocessed vegetables; unprocessed fruit; fresh olives; raw olives | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices, vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |