Drawing for GOURMÉLICIOUS

USPTO serial 78944902

GOURMÉLICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOURMÉLICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SABRINA J. HUDSON

SABRINA J. HUDSON H. J. HEINZ COMPANYP. O. BOX 57PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Baby food; baby formulaACTIVE
029Cranberry sauce; applesauce; instant or pre-cooked soup; soup mixes; jams; meat and fish pastes and spreads; meat extracts; dried vegetables; dried fruits; preserved fruits; preserved vegetables; canned vegetables; canned fruits; meat jellies; meat juices; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; pates; hazelnut spreads; peanut butter; jellies; potato chips; frozen vegetables; pickled vegetables; processed fruit; candied fruit; crystallized fruit; fruit chips; fruit conserves; fruit pastes; fruit pectin; fruit peels; fruit preserves; fruit pulps; fruit rinds; candied fruit snacks; fruit toppings; fruit based spreads; frozen fruits; unprocessed fruits preserved in alcohol; cooking oil; edible oil; salad oil; vegetable oil; olive oil; processed olives; vegetable pastes; dairy based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt, namely, cheese based snack foods; fruit based snack foods; fruit salads; garden salads; vegetable saladsACTIVE
030Meat sauces; marinades; dipping sauces; dressings for fruit; pizza sauces; barbeque sauces; cheese based sauces; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; pasta sauces; vegetable sauces; fish sauces; seafood sauces; poultry sauces; dessert sauces; mayonnaise; vinaigrettes; salsa; chutney; mustard; dry seasoning mixes for gravy, spaghetti, stews and fajitas; spices for meat, fish, and poultry, namely, wet rubs; spice mixes; splashes, namely, meat sauces; sizzlers, namely, meat sauces; bread dips; brushetta; fruit coulis; meat and fish sauces in the nature of relishes; pasta; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; pastries; rolls; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; biscuits; cookies; crackers; chocolate spreads; bread; pies; cakes; sugar confectionery, namely, crystal sugar pieces; candy; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate bars; puddings; macaroni; muffins; chocolate muffins; cakes, namely, swiss rolls; brownies; tarts; bread sticks; vinegar; ketchup; tomato sauces; caramel coated popcorn; caramel coated peanuts; cereal based snack foods; corn chips; pita chips; tortilla chips; rice based snack foods; wheat based snack foods; macaroni salads; pasta salads; rice saladACTIVE
031Fresh vegetables; fresh fruits; unprocessed vegetables; unprocessed fruit; fresh olives; raw olivesACTIVE
032Fruit juices, vegetable juicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 4, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 23, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 9, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Aug 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance