USPTO serial 78949006
UXI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UXI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL.901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Universal Serial Bus (USB) extensions for instrumentation; computer hardware; computer software, namely, software drivers for interfacing with a personal computer's hardware through the operating system, software for connection and synchronous operation of deterministic USB, software for management of a universal serial bus, software for interfacing with client applications, and software for running original equipment computer modules based on synchronous USB operation; pH probes not for medical use, electro-galvanic fuel cell, galvanometers, MEMS devices, potentiometers, accelerometers, strain gauges, switches, hydrophones, loudspeakers, microphones, piezoelectric crystals, laser diodes, light-emitting diodes, photodiodes, phototransistors, photomultiplier tubes, Hall effect sensors, resistance temperature detectors, thermistors for data acquisition, control and monitoring of transducers; computer hardware and software for providing synchronous data acquisition, synchronous control, synchronous monitoring of instrumentation and transducers for use in pressure, temperature, motion, strain gauges in industry, laboratory, scientific, biomedical, telecommunication, automotive, and automation applications; kits containing computer hardware and software for developing a synchronous universal serial bus; distributed timing and synchronization systems comprised of integrated circuits, computer hardware, programmable logic, firmware, operating systems and computer software for distributing accurate time and clock information to a plurality of devices; distributed control systems comprised of integrated circuits, computer hardware, programmable logic, firmware, operating systems and computer software for controlling a plurality of devices either locally or remotely in the fields of science, technology, computer hardware and software, electronic and optical components and equipment, testing, measurement, chemical or biological analysis, telecommunications, and medicine; electronic test, signaling and measurement systems and equipment, namely, oscillators; signal generators and analyzers, logic-signal sources, pulse and data generators, function and arbitrary waveform generators; sweepers, namely, sweeper generators for testing and measuring electronic equipment by means of signal frequency sweep generators and signal sweeping frequency synthesizers that sweep from one frequency to another; spectrum analyzers, logic analyzers, waveform analyzers and oscilloscopes; network and spectrum analyzers; modulation-domain and time-interval analyzers; hand held testing meters, namely, wireless communication testers, telephone, cellular telephone, television, cable television and broadband equipment testers, light wave testers, fiber optic testers, computer and communications network testers, power supply testers, interferometers, vibration transducers, probes for remote electronic test, signalling and measurement, cell-site radio frequency (RF) testers; signalling and measurement testers, DC electronic loads, lasers for test and measurement purposes; chemical and biological analytical equipment, namely, chromatographs, chromatography columns, mass spectrometers; ionization sources sold as part of a mass spectrometer, spectrophotometers; DNA and protein sequencers; capillary electrophoresis systems and gene analysis equipment, namely, DNA and protein sequencers; electrical and computer hardware and software for the analysis of DNA, RNA, cells and proteins, DNA microarrays, DNA microarray scanners, DNA hybridization chambers; chemical hardware and software, namely, spectrophotometers, electrophoresis equipment for the analysis of DNA, RNA, cells and proteins, DNA microarrays, DNA microarray scanners, DNA hybridization equipment; multimeters; power, voltage, current, impedance, inductance, capacitance, and resistance meters; electronic frequency counters; automatic test equipment for integrated circuits, circuit boards and electronic equipment, namely, system on a chip (SOC) testers, memory testers, parametric testers, and in-circuit testers, wire and cables testers; equipment, namely, volt meters, amp meters, resistance meters, impedance meters, network analyzers, and TDR testers for fault location to perform parametric and functional tests used to test wires and cables; wireless communication testers and telephone, cellular telephone, television, cable television and broadband equipment testers used to test communication equipment; light wave test equipment, namely, light wave analyzers for use in measuring the proper wavelength, appearance, and reflected colors of objects; computer and communications network testers; software for monitoring telephone and network traffic for use in the fields of aerospace, defense, automotive, industrial, medical, and consumer electronics; power supplies; interferometers, vibration transducers; data acquisition and control systems comprised of analog and digital signal I/O circuits connected to computers or microcontroller systems or communications networks; remote monitoring probes for use in performing electronic test, signalling and measurement functions; cell-site RF testers; laser-based positioning systems comprised of integrated circuits, computer hardware, and computer software for analyzing, displaying, and storing data; microprocessor development systems, comprised of computer hardware, firmware, and operating systems for use in designing microcontroller-based electronics; DC electronic loads; lasers, not for medical use, for test and measurement purposes; optical sources, detectors and measuring equipment for testing fiber optics in telecommunications, namely, fiber optic cables, couplers, amplifiers splitters, multiplexers; Central processing unit (CPU) clocks for scientific, laboratory or industrial applications; central processing unit (CPU) clocks for use as specialized recording apparatus for scientific, laboratory or industrial applications; metallic cable testers, subscriber loop testers, digital multimeters, source meters, electrometers, digital multimeters and switch cards; signal dividers, amplifiers, voltage supplies, relays, and measuring instruments, namely, ammeters, voltmeters, ohmmeters, electrometers, static meters, and electrical bridges; electronic measurement and test instruments for testing the performance, features, compatibility, interoperability, functionality, compliance and adherence to industry standards in the fields of computers, electronics, and telecommunications; chemical and biological analytical systems and equipment sold as a unit consisting of chromatographs, chromatography columns, septa, seals and syringes; mass spectrometers; ionization apparatus, namely, ion source controls, control software, ion source enclosure apparatus, and associated hardware, all for use in mass spectrometry; spectrophotometers; DNA and protein sequencers; capillary electrophoresis systems and gene analysis equipment, namely, DNA and protein sequencers; electrical, computer, and chemical hardware and software for the analysis of DNA, RNA, cells and proteins, DNA microarrays, DNA microarray scanners, and DNA hybridization chambers; data communication testers; measuring instruments, namely, printed wiring boards and printed circuit boards; image sensors; optical position sensors; solid state lasers not for medical use; fiber-optics for voice, data and video; fiber-optic-links and high-speed I/O products, namely, fiber optic cables, fiber optic light and image conduits, and digital input and output scanners for computer data transfer and mass storage; optical encoders, optical couplers; motion control sensors for industrial equipment; optically isolated components, namely, optical scanners, readers, and cables for use in the fields of industrial equipment and motor control; computer hardware; computer software for use in testing, signaling and measuring electronic, chemical or biological analytical, optical, telecommunication, semiconductor, network management, network security, engineering, and data acquisition equipment for use in the fields of aerospace, defense, automotive, industrial, and medical; computer software that performs tests and measurements of acquisition, control, analysis, and display of analog and digital data and for use in the fields of scientific and engineering data acquisition, analysis, monitoring, and emulating scientific and engineering instruments; computer software for testing the performance, features, compatibility, interoperability, functionality, compliance and adherence to industry standards of computers, electronics, and telecommunications products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHRONOLOGIC PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CHRONOLOGIC PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Fiberbyte Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named UXI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |